Archive for the "Fight against malaria" Category

Interview of the Week 45: Pipaluk de Groot, Co-author and protagonist of “Silent Snow”

PipalukDuring our Symposium next Saturday in Zurich we will show “Silent Snow”, a film about the risks of DDT. Pipaluk de Groot, who is co-author and protagonist, will be our guest and also participates in the discussion after the screening. In this interview she shares her experiences during the production phase and after screenings around the world.


How did you and Jan van den Berg, who is director and co-author of the film, meet before the project started?

I read on the Greenlandic news online about the premiere of the short film. I had just moved to the Netherlands and was very interested in seeing a film about my own country, so I actually just contacted Jan and he invited me to the premiere. After that we kept contact and he asked me to take part in the project of the feature length documentary of “Silent Snow” – and of course I couldn’t say no to this offer.


What were the challenges or special moments during the production phase?

A big challenge was to get off from my current job, but actually they gave me unpaid leave so I could travel with Jan one week a month. This meant that we had to film in small steps, but as you can see it did work out. We did have many special moments during filming – I think one specific part was sleeping on the ice in Greenland. This was a great experience! How often do you get this opportunity? I woke up to the sound of pieces of ice breaking of a nearby glacier, that was just an amazing sound. I have slept under the sky in Greenland before and in other countries, but this experience on the ice beats it all.


What are the key messages of the films, the short version and the documentary?

The short version raised awareness about the global problem of pollution which affects us all. The feature length documentary goes more into details of the same threat by talking to people from all around the world who are fighting for a better life and a better, cleaner world. For me travelling with “Silent Snow” taught me so much, not just about other cultures but also that we can all make a difference. This is our shared world and as also stated in the film: Pollution respects no country borders. A polluting plant will not only affect the vicinity but will spread to other countries as well. This makes it clear that we all need to take action.


What reactions from the audience do you observe during or after the screenings?

I see many different reactions which also depend on where the screening takes place: One scene shows a dead seal being cut open and the reaction in Paris was people closing their eyes, whereas the indigenous audience in Costa Rica weren’t impressed by this sight. I am very proud of my heritage and I do respect people’s reactions, but the suburban consumers often don’t think about meat coming from a real animal. Often after the screenings people thank me for my work and this is very positive. It’s great to learn that all of us can make a difference and that so many people are willing to do their part.

Fighting Malaria Without DDT

Dear Friends of Biovision

It’s now over a year since I became President of the Millennium Institute in Washington D.C. Many of you probably find it difficult to imagine what exactly I do here, and specifically what I am doing on behalf of Biovision. That is why I have decided to write a blog, a web diary, not a daily one, admittedly, but one which I hope will appear here every month. So at the beginning of each month I will tell you what I have been doing and what I have been thinking about.

The last few weeks have been a period of intense emotion for me, ranging from the heights of joy to the depths of anger and disbelief. Being an optimist, I will start with the joy: in September, along with a number of important partners, mainly from America and Africa, I was able to submit a major project to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The idea behind it is backed by a feasibility study supported by Biovision, and the aim is to halt the spread of malaria in Kenya by attacking it from several different angles at the same time.

It had taken nine months of hard work before we were ready to submit our application. Those involved included the ICIPE, the Kenyan Ministry of Health, universities in America and many other institutions. Together we pursued the vision of fighting malaria with a view to eradicating it entirely in Kenya within five years.

We all know that there is no patent remedy against disease. It is only through an all-round approach, i.e. taking a number of different actions simultaneously, that we can conquer malaria. These measures include educational work, training, research, controlling the larvae of the anopheles mosquito, mosquito nets, water management and medical supplies, to name only the most important.

It was a hard struggle before the partners had got all their ideas together. But a few weeks ago we were able to submit the project to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. We know that the Gates Foundation favours holistic approaches, and we hope that we shall soon be able to start implementing our project.

On almost the very same day that we submitted our application, there came a bitter blow. The World Health Organisation, WHO, suddenly announced that it was once again going to back the poison DDT as a means to combat malaria. That was something I had not expected.

I can still clearly remember visiting northern Mozambique in the 1980s. There was a huge problem with mealybugs (a pest of cassava), and I had come to see what could be done about them. What I saw appalled me. The people out in the fields were snow white, as if someone had poured flour over them. But it wasn’t flour. It was DDT, which the local people, wearing no kind of protection, were spraying over the fields.

DDT is a strong poison. Yes, it kills insects – and how! But it also gets into the food chain, accumulates in fishes and birds of prey, and in the end gets into the human organism too. DDT is carcinogenic, and since it is highly persistent it has a lasting impact on the environment.

Since I witnessed those things in Mozambique DDT has – fortunately – been banned. And yet now WHO wants to go back to using this poison in order to combat malarial mosquitoes. This makes me so angry. The fact that a poison is efficient and cheap is no argument at all as far as I am concerned, especially when you consider that no-one mentioning the collateral costs which using it will inevitably entail. And why should Africans have to use DDT, if we in Europe and America would never accept it for ourselves?

Our initiative will attack malaria at the roots. We don’t simply want to kill the mosquitoes – that would be to attack the symptoms – but to start with the larvae, and most importantly, to deprive the mosquitoes of a habitat in which they can spread. You don’t achieve that through poison, but by giving people the relevant information and by conducting research.

Our initiative will cost money. But we believe that people in Africa have the right to benefit from modern research just like anyone else. To expose them to the disastrous effects that we have already experienced, simply in order to save a little money, is criminal and irresponsible. Because alternatives do exist. They exist and they should be used. That is precisely what we are fighting for.

Hans Rudolf Herren